Access Control 101: Cards, Biometrics or Mobile — What to Choose?
Access control lets you decide who gets through every door in your building — and keeps a record of every entry and exit. But with RFID cards, fingerprint readers, face recognition and mobile credentials all available, choosing the right technology can feel overwhelming. This guide cuts through the noise.
RFID Card / Fob Access
The most widely used access control technology. Each user carries a proximity card or key fob with a unique ID. When held near a reader, the system checks the ID against an access database and unlocks the door if authorised.
Pros: Low cost, fast (tap and enter in under a second), no hygiene concerns, easy to add or remove users, works in any lighting condition.
Cons: Cards can be lost, stolen or shared — the system authenticates the card, not the person. Lost cards must be immediately deactivated.
Best for: General office access, car parks, lift control, and any high-traffic door where speed is important.
Fingerprint Biometrics
Fingerprint readers scan and match the unique ridge pattern of a user's finger. Modern optical and capacitive sensors are fast and accurate — typically matching in under 0.5 seconds with a false acceptance rate below 0.001%.
Pros: Cannot be lost or shared (you authenticate the person, not a credential), no cards to manage, detailed audit trail tied to a specific individual.
Cons: Can struggle with wet, dirty or worn fingerprints (common in manufacturing environments). Perceived hygiene concerns (sharing a reader) — addressed by contactless capacitive sensors.
Best for: Server rooms, finance departments, HR offices, warehouses — anywhere you need to verify identity, not just credential.
Face Recognition
Facial recognition readers use a camera and AI algorithms to identify a person by their facial geometry. Modern systems are contactless, fast (under 0.3 seconds) and work reliably in varied lighting.
Pros: Completely contactless (no touch required), works even if hands are full, high accuracy with modern AI sensors, doubles as an attendance system.
Cons: Higher upfront cost than card readers. Some older systems struggle with masks, glasses or significant changes in appearance — though modern AI-based systems handle these well.
Best for: Post-pandemic environments prioritising contactless access, reception areas, combined access/attendance deployments.
Mobile Credentials
Mobile access control uses a smartphone as the credential — via Bluetooth, NFC or QR code. The user's phone communicates with the reader to authenticate access.
Pros: No physical cards to print or manage, credentials can be issued and revoked instantly by email/app, phones are rarely forgotten or shared.
Cons: Requires users to have smartphones and have the app installed. Battery life is a dependency. Higher reader cost.
Best for: Technology companies, flexible workspaces, contractor management, or any site where issuing and revoking access remotely is a priority.
Multi-Factor Authentication
For high-security areas, combining two methods (e.g., card + fingerprint, or PIN + face recognition) provides a much higher level of assurance. Pujaso regularly installs multi-factor access control for server rooms, pharma storage, cash handling areas and government facilities.
Key Takeaways
- RFID cards are fast, low-cost and best for general office access
- Fingerprint biometrics authenticate the person — ideal for secure areas
- Face recognition is contactless and doubles as an attendance system
- Mobile credentials allow instant remote issuance and revocation
- Multi-factor (card + biometric) is recommended for high-security zones